On July 1, 2024, the “junk fee” amendment to the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) took effect. Under this new provision, it is a violation of the CLRA if a company advertises, displays, or offers goods or services at a price, but does not disclose all mandatory fees or charges when displaying the price. Businesses failing to abide by this requirement...

Allison Willett secured a momentous victory for our client against Pixi, Inc., when the Court overruled Pixi’s Demurrer in its entirety and denied Pixi’s Request for Judicial Notice as to each exhibit. Pixi’s demurrer maintained the federal district court’s decision in Wilson v. Colourpop (Wilson v. ColourPop Cosms., LLC (N.D. Cal Sept. 7, 2023 No. 22-CV-05198-TLT)...

After a lengthy five-year legal battle, San Francisco Superior Court granted final approval for a $38 million class action settlement to reimburse purchasers of Lash Boost, a product used topically on eyelashes. The eyelash product contains Isopropyl Cloprostenate which is an ingredient associated with health hazards. The settlement also provided for prominent...

Daily Journal recognizes W|W for reaching a $38,000,000.00 “Top Settlement” in Lash Boost Cases. As Class Counsel, W|W represents consumers alleging that Rodan + Fields failed to disclose material information regarding eyelash serum Lash Boost, including potential side effects and adverse reactions presented by its ingredient Isopropyl Cloprostenate (“ICP”)....